ISSUED BY: Human Rights Desk, Department of Information and International Relations, Tibetan Government-in-Exile (Dharamsala, India)

Survival Under Surveillance: A Brief Overview of the Human Rights Situation in Tibet,1994-1995 (con't)


A. Population Transfer: The Final Solution ?

1. An Overview of Chinese Population Transfer in Tibet

In the past few years, the Chinese government has been concentrating on settling more and more People's Liberation Army troops (hereinafter referred to as PLA) and administrators into Tibet to gain more political control in a country where political activism against occupation is on the rise. Today new recruits joining the 300,000-strong PLA occupation force are expected to settle permanently in Tibet and in 1995 the PLA military headquarters were moved from Chengdu to Lhasa. China has created another channel to transfer Chinese into Tibet: internationally-funded development projects are now the vehicles for Chinese migration.

On May 12, 1993 a top secret meeting was held in Chengdu to work out strategies to solve the problem of Tibet. According to the leaked report of the meeting, the strategy adopted was to flood Tibet with more Chinese settlers. Reports in the Hong Kong press in May 1994 suggested that leading figures in Beijing have been pushing for the rapid development of the TAR with a massive programme of preferential policies aimed at attracting more Chinese settlers. Then in 1994 the authorities in Tibet publicly outlined their population transfer policy at the Third Work Forum on Tibet held in Beijing in July 1994 where it was officially stated that former soldiers, paramilitary troops, cadres, technicians and entrepeneurs were to be encouraged to move to Tibet through incentives provided by the central government in Beijing, such as preferential employment and housing. It was also stated that permanent settlement would be encouraged.

Ever since the 1949/1950 invasion, China has been illegally occupying Tibet and using this occupation to transfer its population into the areas of Tibet known as Kham (Chinese: Chinese provinces of Gansu, Sichuan and Yunnan) and Amdo (Chinese: Qinghai province). What China refers to as Tibet, refers only to what has been redefined as the Tibet Autonomous Region ("TAR") and incorporates the region of U-Tsang. The regions of Amdo and Kham, are now annexed to "China". This is significant because the Chinese claim that the annexed territory is not Tibet, so according to their logic they are not transferring their population to Tibet (Refer to the map of Tibet provided).

The Chinese government has always denied a policy of population transfer and justified the high numbers of Chinese settlers in Tibet by claiming that Tibetans are "backward" and need specialists from China to advance Tibet's economy. Evidence collected from our sources in Tibet confirms that population transfer only serves the economic interests of the Chinese government and its citizens. Chinese population transfer leads to direct discrimination against Tibetans. Chinese settle in Tibet because they are attracted by economic incentives which the Chinese government offers to the detriment of Tibetans.

International development projects initiated by China to support their population transfer results in direct and indirect discrimination against Tibetans today. Two major international development assistance projects in Tibet have been criticised and one postponed due to complaints related to the discrimination and exclusion of Tibetans living in the area. The Panam Integrated Rural Development Project, to have been funded by the European Union and designed to create the "wheat granary " of Tibet, was postponed in 1994 and the UN World Food Programme Project "3357" in the Lhasa river valley is criticised for disadvantaging Tibetan farmers and encouraging and benefiting Chinese settlers in the area.

Reports Received in the Past Two Years of Chinese Population Transfer in Tibet:


Chinese population transfer to Tibet merely serves to strengthen China's claim that Tibet is an inalienable part of China and further reduces Tibetan people to a minority in their own country. Chinese population transfer directly discriminates against Tibetans in that Tibetans are deliberately excluded by the Chinese authorities from economic development policies and internationally-funded development projects in Tibet.


[ previous section ]  |  [ next section ]  |  [ index ]